Financial Literacy Archives - Page 3 of 12 - Social Enterprise Development Partnerships, Inc.

Power to the Nano: How SEDPI is shaking up economic norms for the better

The SEDPI Group of Social Enterprises is a Philippines-based organization that operates with the aim of alleviating poverty among Filipinos worldwide. Since its inception in 2004, it has grown to include eight collaborative organizations executing three key programs: SEDPI KaSosyo, SEDPI KaNegosyo, and Usapang Pera. These programs focus on social investments, nanofinancing, and financial education respectively.

SEDPI programs

The SEDPI KaSosyo program attracts social investors who prioritize people and the environment over profit. These investors support nanoenterprises, social enterprises, and development organizations through a profit-sharing scheme known as Joint Venture Savings (JVS).

The SEDPI KaNegosyo program provides sustainable finance for nanoenterprise development. This includes providing livelihood capital, promoting a savings culture, providing social safety nets, and even creating affordable and inclusive housing communities through various sub-programs.

Usapang Pera, the financial education program, provides a comprehensive suite of financial empowerment services that include online trainings, live events, and publications. The program uses real-life examples and practical applications to improve personal financial habits and foster positive social change.
Over the years, SEDPI and its founders have received several recognitions and awards for their work. They remain committed to their vision of empowering Filipinos worldwide to support sustainable nanoenterprises.

Social and solidarity economy: The SEDPI approach

Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) encompasses a range of organizations and enterprises that prioritize social objectives and uphold principles of solidarity, mutual aid, and social justice. In the Philippines, one of the organizations embodying these values is the SEDPI Group of Social Enterprises (SEDPI). Their model provides a roadmap for implementing Social and Solidarity Economy principles in practice.

Empowering Nanoenterprises through KaNegosyo

SEDPI’s KaNegosyo program follows six foundational principles that reflect a commitment to the values and practices of the Social and Solidarity Economy.

Financial Education: SEDPI prioritizes intensive savings mobilization, universal insurance coverage, provision of investment opportunities, and liberation from oppressive loan products. By offering financial education, SEDPI empowers nanoenterprises to make informed decisions and contribute to a more equitable economy.

Capital Infusion, Not Loans: SEDPI forms joint ventures with nanoenterprises, establishing a co-ownership business partnership, offering an alternative to loans that require perpetual interest and penalty charges. This innovative approach fosters economic resilience and promotes shared prosperity.

Profit and Risk Sharing: SEDPI’s strategy includes a profit-sharing mechanism that favors labor and participation. Risks are equally shared, fostering collaborative problem-solving and economic resilience, central tenets of the SSE model.

Loss Follows Capital: SEDPI’s model ensures that losses, defined as bankruptcy or the nanoenterprise’s decision to liquidate assets, are proportionate to the party’s capital contribution. This system upholds the principles of mutual aid and fairness central to the SSE.

Non-Profit damayan:SEDPI provides a non-profit insurance product that places solidarity and protection above income generation. This model strengthens collective resilience and reflects the ethos of SSE.

Partnership and Cooperation: SEDPI aims to establish partnerships with government agencies and like-minded organizations. This collaboration aims to bring basic services closer to low-income groups and advances the SSE’s mission of poverty eradication.

Social Protection through KaTambayayong

SEDPI’s KaTambayayong (KT) program addresses the unique needs and challenges faced by nanoenterprises, emphasizing the importance of providing adequate, accessible, affordable, and efficient social safety nets. This approach reflects a deep commitment to social protection, a key element of the SSE framework.

Understanding the vulnerability of nanoenterprises to natural disasters and the growing impact of climate change, SEDPI KT aims to provide a robust support system. The program offers benefits that cover basic costs or assist in disaster recovery, ensuring that these small businesses can withstand crises and remain operational.

SEDPI KT departs from the often tedious and lengthy claims processing typical of traditional for-profit insurance companies. Instead, the program is dedicated to providing near same-day delivery of benefits through a simplified documentation process, ensuring efficient and prompt support.

In keeping with the principle of solidarity, SEDPI KT is committed to offering social safety nets that are affordable and within the financial reach of nanoenterprises. This enables more businesses to access the program and enjoy its benefits, enhancing their resilience and stability.

SEDPI KT complements existing government social insurance programs – SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG, bridging gaps in coverage and providing additional support where needed. This cooperative approach underscores the core SSE values of partnership and mutual aid.

Fostering a new economic paradigm

SEDPI’s programs embody the principles of the Social and Solidarity Economy, demonstrating that social objectives can be pursued alongside economic goals. By prioritizing mutual aid, shared prosperity, and social justice, SEDPI is contributing to the creation of a more equitable and resilient economy. Their work offers an inspiring model for other organizations seeking to implement SSE principles in their operations.

SEDPI and PhilHealth partnership: An empowering step towards accessible health insurance for nanoenterprises

The significance of the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP) under the Universal Health Care (UHC) Act in the Philippines is undisputable. As a nation, we must ensure that healthcare is both accessible and affordable to every Filipino citizen, particularly those from marginalized sectors.

SEDPI, an organization that champions social investments, nanofinancing, and financial education to alleviate poverty among Filipinos worldwide, is taking a significant stride in this direction. In a recent development, SEDPI entered into a strategic partnership with the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth), marking a significant step in fortifying its KaTambayayong program.

This alliance with PhilHealth follows the organization’s successful collaborations with Pag-IBIG Fund in 2018 and the Social Security System (SSS) in 2019, enhancing SEDPI’s commitment to providing comprehensive social protection to its members. As SEDPI President and CEO, Vince Rapisura states, “Our partnerships with government agencies aim to bridge the gap in access to social welfare services, especially for marginalized communities.”

In the last six years, the KaTambayayong program has disbursed Php 19.1 million as benefits to its members to cover for death, calamity, medical, fire and accident assistance. As of June 2023 alone, the program has released Php 2.9 million in benefits to 1,199 members. These milestones highlight the program’s commitment to providing an accessible and dependable safety net for nanoenterprises in times of crisis.

The partnership with PhilHealth is poised to amplify the benefits that SEDPI members can avail of. Through the Group Enrollment Program under the NHIP, SEDPI will facilitate the registration of its enrollees, conduct educational campaigns about PhilHealth policies and benefits, and remit their premium contributions, thereby ensuring its members are covered by health insurance.

Looking towards the future, SEDPI aims to further enhance its network of collaborations, with the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) and the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) being the next potential partners. These future partnerships will focus on securing civil identity documents for SEDPI members, further solidifying their access to government services.

Indeed, the partnership between SEDPI and PhilHealth is not just about providing health insurance; it is about empowering Filipino nanoenterprises, reducing poverty, and fostering a healthier nation. This collaboration represents a vital step towards ensuring the well-being of Filipinos, solidifying SEDPI’s commitment to sustainable development and its overarching goal of poverty alleviation.

SEDPI at 19: Pioneering change and empowering communities

The Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF): A critical examination of the Philippines’ proposed sovereign wealth fund

Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are state-owned investment funds that are used by countries to benefit their economies and citizens. They consist of various types of assets such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or other financial instruments, often derived from a nation’s surplus reserves.

The concept of SWFs originated in the mid-20th century, pioneered by countries with surplus revenues primarily from commodities like oil. For instance, the Kuwait Investment Authority, established in 1953, is often cited as the first SWF. Over time, many other countries

SWFs significantly contribute to economic stabilization. They invest surplus revenues, thereby providing a cushion against economic downturns. For instance, during periods of low oil prices, oil-rich countries can utilize their SWFs to balance any decrease in revenue.

It stands out for their long-term investment strategies. Unlike private investors who might focus on short-term gains, SWFs have the advantage of a long-term perspective, enabling them to undertake investments that, despite potential short-term risk or unprofitability, could yield substantial returns in the future.

SWFs can profoundly influence a nation’s strategic objectives. By channeling investments into specific sectors or industries, they can promote national priorities, such as infrastructure development, technological progress, or economic diversification. In practice, several oil-rich nations use their SWFs to invest in industries outside of oil, aiming to diversify their economies and reduce oil revenue dependency.

Different types of sovereign wealth funds

Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) can be classified into four primary types, each reflecting the specific economic goals and policy objectives of their respective countries. These include savings funds, stabilization funds, pension reserve funds, and strategic development SWFs.

Savings funds are designed to transform non-renewable assets, such as oil or minerals, into a diversified portfolio of international assets. These funds aim to conserve wealth for future generations once these non-renewable resources are depleted. For instance, the Government Pension Fund Global of Norway falls under this category, as it invests oil revenues to secure future generations’ welfare.

Stabilization funds are typically used to insulate the economy from commodity price volatility and other economic shocks. They collect surplus revenue during periods of high commodity prices and release funds into the budget during downturns to help stabilize government revenues and counteract economic cycles. An example is the Russian National Wealth Fund, established to support Russia’s pension system and balance the federal budget in times of oil price volatility.

Pension reserve funds are not sources of pension contributions but serve as a buffer to assist the funding of future pension liabilities. These funds are typically invested in a diversified portfolio of assets to generate a steady return over time. The Australian Future Fund is an example of a pension reserve fund.

Lastly, strategic development SWFs aim to fulfill specific domestic economic and policy objectives, such as developing certain sectors, promoting economic diversification, or increasing employment. These funds often invest in domestic industries and infrastructure. The Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, for instance, targets sectors that will deliver economic and employment benefits to Ireland.

How SWFs are funded

The funding sources for Sovereign Wealth Funds can be traced back to a variety of economic activities and reserves depending on the fund’s nature and the country’s economic structure. Common sources of funding include commodity exports, foreign exchange reserves, transfer of assets from other funds, and fiscal surpluses.

Commodity exports, particularly of oil and gas, are a significant source of funding for many SWFs. For countries rich in these resources, the revenues generated from their exports can result in significant budget surpluses, which are then channeled into their respective SWFs. Notable examples include the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority funded by oil exports, and the Government Pension Fund Global of Norway funded by oil and gas revenues.

Foreign exchange reserves are another crucial source of funding for SWFs. Countries with substantial foreign exchange reserves, often due to a large volume of exports or a significant influx of foreign direct investment, can allocate a portion of these reserves to establish or bolster their SWFs.

Some SWFs are also funded through the transfer of assets from other government funds or entities. For instance, an initial corpus for the fund might be sourced from a country’s central bank reserves or a public pension fund.

Lastly, fiscal surpluses arising from prudent economic management and strong economic growth can also be channeled into SWFs. Countries that consistently run budget surpluses may choose to invest these funds for future needs or economic stabilization. For example, Singapore’s Government Investment Corporation is funded in part by the country’s budget surpluses.

Countries with SWF best practices

‘Best practices’ in the context of Sovereign Wealth Funds usually refers to effective and ethical management practices that have proven successful across a range of funds. Some of these practices include establishing clear objectives for the fund, which can guide its investment strategy and help stakeholders understand its purpose. Implementing robust governance and operational frameworks is another key best practice. This involves having clear lines of responsibility and control, as well as efficient processes for decision-making and execution. Finally, transparency and accountability are crucial for maintaining public trust in SWFs. This can involve regular public reporting, independent audits, and strong oversight mechanisms.

Several countries are recognized for their adherence to best practices in the management of their SWFs. Among them, Norway, with its Government Pension Fund Global, is frequently lauded for its high transparency and robust governance structure. Singapore’s two SWFs, Temasek Holdings and GIC, are also acknowledged for their clear investment strategies, sound governance, and significant contribution to the country’s economy. Similarly, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) in the United Arab Emirates, one of the largest SWFs in the world, is recognized for its diversified investment portfolio and prudent risk management strategies.

Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global, one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, is primarily funded by the country’s oil revenues. The fund is intended to finance public pensions and prevent the Norwegian economy from overheating due to excessive spending of oil revenues. A standout aspect of the Norwegian fund is its high degree of transparency. It regularly publishes detailed reports about its operations and investments, and it’s known for its strict ethical investment guidelines, which prohibit investments in companies involved in activities such as tobacco production, certain types of weapons manufacturing, and severe environmental damage.

Singapore manages two sovereign wealth funds: Temasek Holdings and GIC. These funds are primarily funded by Singapore’s foreign reserves. Their overall goal is to strengthen Singapore’s economy and ensure the well-being of future generations. Temasek Holdings and GIC are renowned for their strong governance structures and clear investment strategies. They are recognized for their strategic investments in a variety of sectors, both domestically and internationally, contributing to the robustness of Singapore’s economy.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is primarily funded by Abu Dhabi’s oil surplus. Its main objective is to diversify income sources away from oil and stabilize the economy. ADIA is known for its wide-ranging investment portfolio, which spans numerous sectors and asset classes across various countries. This diversified approach helps to spread risk and increases the potential for returns. Additionally, ADIA has a reputation for prudent risk management, which includes a thorough evaluation of potential investments and careful monitoring of its portfolio.

Advantages of SWFs

Sovereign Wealth Funds serve as an important mechanism for smoothing the impact of volatile commodity prices or trade surpluses, providing economic stability. For instance, when a country experiences a surge in oil prices, it can channel the extra revenue into its SWF. During times of lower prices or economic downturns, the country can use the SWF to compensate for the shortfall, thereby stabilizing the economy. Furthermore, SWFs allow countries to diversify their income sources by investing in various asset classes and industries across different countries, reducing the economic risk associated with over-reliance on a single volatile revenue source, such as oil in the case of many Middle Eastern countries.

As state-owned entities, SWFs can afford a longer-term investment horizon than most private investors. This long-term perspective provides SWFs with the advantage of investing in riskier or less liquid assets that may offer higher returns over a longer period, like infrastructure or private equity. Furthermore, their ability to remain patient and hold onto their investments during periods of market volatility allows them to benefit from long-term economic trends and potentially realize higher returns compared to short-term investments.

SWFs often invest in sectors that align with their country’s strategic objectives, promoting national development and growth. For instance, a SWF might invest in infrastructure projects, thereby facilitating economic development and job creation. In the case of technology or renewable energy, investments by SWFs can drive innovation and help transition the economy towards a more sustainable model. This alignment of investments with national goals is another crucial advantage of SWFs.

The concept of intergenerational equity is central to many SWFs, particularly those funded by revenue from depletable resources like oil. By setting aside and investing a portion of the income derived from these resources, SWFs can ensure that the wealth benefits future generations and not just the current populace. For example, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, one of the world’s largest SWFs, was established to invest the profits from Norway’s oil and gas resources, securing the welfare of future generations long after these resources are exhausted.

Disadvantages of SWFs

One significant concern surrounding Sovereign Wealth Funds is the potential for mismanagement and corruption. Especially in countries where transparency and oversight mechanisms are lacking, there is a risk that SWFs could be susceptible to such practices. For instance, there have been allegations of corruption and mismanagement in Malaysia’s 1MDB fund, where billions of dollars were reportedly misappropriated. In countries with weak institutional frameworks and regulatory oversight, the large amounts of money managed by SWFs can be prone to misuse, which could lead to significant economic and social implications.

Another disadvantage of SWFs is the potential concentration of economic power. With their enormous assets, SWFs have the ability to wield significant influence over markets and corporations, leading to concerns about market manipulation or exerting undue influence. For example, a large investment by a SWF in a particular sector could potentially distort market prices. Additionally, SWFs’ investments could have implications for national security, particularly when they invest in strategic industries of other countries.

Large-scale investments by SWFs, particularly in domestic markets, could potentially lead to economic overheating and asset price inflation. By pumping significant amounts of money into specific sectors or asset classes, SWFs could contribute to overvaluation, which can lead to asset bubbles and exacerbate economic instability. For instance, excessive investment in the real estate sector could drive up property prices, making housing unaffordable for many citizens and potentially leading to a property bubble. Thus, while SWFs can contribute to economic growth and stability, they also need to manage their investments carefully to avoid contributing to economic instability.

Controversies surrounding SWFs

Sovereign Wealth Funds are often criticized for a lack of transparency and opacity in their operations. For example, the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) has faced several allegations and legal actions related to mismanagement and corruption due to its lack of transparency. Similarly, China’s Investment Corporation (CIC) has faced criticism over the lack of clarity surrounding its investment strategy and performance.

There is also the risk of political interference in SWFs. The Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) has been viewed as a tool of state policy for geopolitical influence rather than an independent financial institution for profit maximization. Similarly, the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) has been closely tied to the ruling family, raising questions about its independence.

Large SWFs can also pose a risk to global financial stability. For instance, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) is one of the world’s largest SWFs and its investment decisions can have a significant impact on global markets. Similarly, the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) controls a large SWF whose investments can significantly influence global financial markets.

The Proposed Maharlika Investment Fund of the Philippines

House Bill No. 6398, also known as the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) bill, was certified as urgent by President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. The bill’s primary aim is to stimulate economic activity and development in the Philippines through strategic and high-impact infrastructure projects, serving as a new growth catalyst.

The proposed Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) is primarily intended to stimulate the economy in the face of downgraded global growth projections. This comes at a time when the world economy is dealing with several challenges, including debilitating inflation, fluctuating and unstable prices of crude oil and other fuel products due to the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, and continuing interest rate hikes in the international financial sector. By supporting strategic and high-impact infrastructure projects, the MIF is envisioned to act as a new catalyst for growth, accelerating economic activity and development in the Philippines.

Maharlika Investment Corporation

The proposed Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) will be managed by the Maharlika Investment Corp. (MIC). However, the management and governance of the MIF have come under scrutiny, particularly with the provisions in the Senate MIF bill that would allow foreigners to sit on the board of MIC. Critics, including Rep. Arlene Brosas, argue that this could lead to foreign control over local resources. There are also worries about the potential for “money laundering” due to the discretionary powers given to the Board of Directors, as voiced by Rep. France Castro.

President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos has certified the Maharlika Investment Fund bill as urgent, expressing the need for a wealth fund to counter the impact of several economic challenges, including inflation, fluctuating oil prices, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and interest rate hikes. The president believes the fund could stimulate the economy by accelerating the implementation of large infrastructure projects. The urgent certification allows the bill to bypass the normal legislative process, which entails readings and deliberations on three separate days. As a result, the bill could be passed more quickly, but at the risk of lawmakers not having ample time to read and study the proposed measures.

Funding MIF

The proposed Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) is expected to receive initial capital from major financial institutions such as the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP), the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP), and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). However, there are concerns that diverting funds from LBP and DBP to the MIF might affect the availability of funds for farmers and microenterprises, which are the primary clientele of these banks.

In addition, the Senate bill reintroduces pension funds such as the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), Social Security System (SSS), and Pag-IBIG as potential investors in the MIF. It should be noted, however, that the participation of these pension funds is voluntary and not mandatory.

Moreover, the bill proposes annual contributions from the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) and other government-owned gaming operators to boost the fund’s capital. It should be noted that these are profits from gaming operations, and diverting them to the MIF could have implications for other sectors funded by these entities.

The MIF is expected to raise additional capital through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) on the Philippine Stock Exchange. This implies that the fund will be listed on the stock exchange and shares of the fund will be made available to the public. This move is intended to democratize access to the fund and encourage public participation in the fund’s growth and profits.

MIF concerns and criticisms

Senator Risa Hontiveros, a vocal critic of the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) bill, has expressed several concerns about its quick passage and potential implications. She pointed out the depletion of income from the Malampaya oil and gas fields and the yet-to-be-passed law aimed at boosting the government’s income from mining operations. She also warned against the use of highly profitable funds of government financial institutions like Land Bank and Development Bank of the Philippines, which she argues could negatively impact farmers and small businesses. Additionally, Hontiveros raised concerns about the potential risks of using Bangko Sentral funds, highlighting their role in safeguarding against peso depreciation, price increases, and loan interest rate hikes.

The Makabayan Bloc in the House of Representatives, a coalition of left-leaning legislators, has not been silent about their concerns surrounding the proposed Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF). A central theme of their criticism is the potential for the MIF to have transparency issues, given the amount of public funds it will manage and the potential for the fund to fall under the influence of political interests. They also questioned the necessity of creating a new fund, suggesting that existing national agencies could be restructured or optimized to fulfill similar goals. Additionally, the Bloc has expressed fears that the MIF might be used as a tool for political patronage, potentially leading to corruption as large sums of public funds could come under the control of a select few individuals.

Recommendations

The Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF), recently proposed in the Philippines, has stirred a mix of hope and concern among stakeholders. The MIF, designed to stimulate economic growth through strategic infrastructure projects, could serve as a new catalyst for development amidst global economic uncertainties. However, the proposed fund has been met with skepticism and criticism due to a variety of issues, such as concerns over governance, transparency, the source of funding, and the lack of clear investment guidelines. Despite these concerns, the bill has been certified as urgent by President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., signifying the need to kick-start this initiative for the economic future of the nation.

Strong governance structures should be at the heart of the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) and its managing entity, the Maharlika Investment Corporation (MIC). These structures should foster a culture of professionalism, transparency, and accountability while incorporating robust checks and balances to mitigate the potential for mismanagement or misuse of funds. This foundational recommendation, when well implemented, would pave the way for confidence, both domestically and internationally, in the operations of the MIF.

Enhanced transparency is a key necessity for the MIF, considering the high stakes involved and the significant public interest. The fund should be mandated to provide regular, comprehensive, and publicly accessible reports of its activities, investments, and returns. These transparency measures will serve as a deterrent against corruption and engender a sense of public trust and accountability in the fund’s management.

To alleviate concerns surrounding the source of funds, the MIF should primarily draw from the General Appropriations Act and contributions from the private sector. Existing financial institutions, such as the Land Bank, Development Bank of the Philippines, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, and the surplus of GOCCs, are already serving their respective mandates and may not possess the surplus funds to sustainably contribute to the MIF. Therefore, it’s crucial to diversify and clarify the fund’s financial structure to ensure its viability and reassure stakeholders.

Establishing clear investment guidelines is another critical step for the MIF. These guidelines should be detailed, aligning with the country’s overarching economic goals and sustainability principles. To ensure effective and timely execution, the MIF should ideally concentrate on a maximum of three specific investment areas per year. Such focus will minimize the risk of spreading resources too thinly and not being able to bring projects to completion.

The implementation of MIF should be gradual, allowing for continual refinements based on real-time learning and feedback. This cautious approach can help mitigate risks, manage unintended consequences, and increase the fund’s adaptability in a dynamic economic landscape.

The inclusion of regular external audits and oversight in the MIF’s operational structure can provide an additional layer of checks and balances. These audits should be carried out by reputable external entities and serve to reinforce good governance and transparency in the management of the fund.

Existing government institutions be strengthened to more effectively fulfill their mandates. This approach helps to avoid duplication of efforts and allows resources to be directed more efficiently. The MIF should refrain from investing in areas where other government institutions are already capable of delivering results, preventing redundancy and fostering greater efficiency in the allocation of public funds.

The establishment of the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) represents a significant and necessary step forward for the Philippine economy, particularly in the face of current economic challenges. This initiative, however, should be balanced with the implementation of robust safeguards to ensure the maintenance of financial stability and the protection of public interest.

Success of the MIF hinges on more than its mere establishment; prudent and transparent management is crucial. This fund will need to navigate a complex economic landscape while maintaining trust and demonstrating fiscal responsibility. A series of recommendations have been provided with this balance in mind, aimed at guiding the MIF towards achieving its economic goals and maintaining public trust.

The success of MIF will not only be a testament to its management’s acumen but also to the fund’s foundational principles of governance, transparency, and accountability. These guiding principles will be essential to ensuring that the MIF can effectively stimulate economic activity and development, whilst also safeguarding public interest and financial stability. This holistic approach to the MIF’s establishment and operation is fundamental to its ability to serve as a new catalyst for growth within the Philippines.

SEDPI, Tumutugon sa Kalamidad: Relief Operations at Pagsusulong ng Resilient Housing sa Davao del Norte at Agusan del Sur

Nitong ika-16 ng Marso, 2023, nagsagawa ang Social Enterprise Development Partnerships Inc. (SEDPI) ng relief operations sa mga lugar na apektado ng Low Pressure Area sa Carmen, Davao del Norte at Prosperidad, Agusan del Sur. Ang organisasyon ay tumugon sa mga pangangailangan ng mga tao sa mga apektadong lugar sa pamamagitan ng SEDPI KaTambayayong na isang uri ng damayan system.

Batay sa datos na nakalap ng SEDPI, apektado ang 193 sa 1,097 members sa Carmen, Davao del Norte, habang sa Prosperidad, Agusan del Sur ay 38 sa 1,251 members ang apektado ng Low Pressure Area. Ayon sa mga members sa lugar, umabot ang tubig hanggang bewang at leeg. Karamihan sa mga residente ay pansamantalang tumira sa mga kalsada at sa municipal gymnasium bilang evacuation center.

Nagbibigay ang SEDPI KaTambayayong ng life, sickness, calamity, fire, funeral, at accident assistance benefits. Kasama sa calamity benefit ang relief goods at PhP250 cash. Ang mga benefits na ito ay karaniwang naibibigat sa mga members sa loob lamang ng isa o dalawang araw, na labis na mas mabilis kumpara sa 3 hanggang 6 na buwan na claims processing ng karaniwang insurance company. Ang mga benepisyong ito ay eksklusibo lamang sa SEDPI members at maaring nagbabago depende sa nakolektang pondo. Noong 2021 at 2022, umabot sa PhP4.6M at 5.9M ang kabuuang naipamigay na benepisyo sa mga SEDPI KaTambayayong members.

Bagaman umabot na ang relief operations sa mga lugar na ito, hindi pa rin sapat ang mga tulong na ipinagkakaloob upang tugunan ang lahat ng pangangailangan ng mga apektadong residente. Kailangan ng mga solusyong tumutugon sa pinagmumulan mismo ng problema. Una na rito ang paglipat sa mga residente mula sa mga hazard prone areas papunta sa mga safe zones. Pangalawa, ang pagbibigay ng abot-kayang pabahay sa mga residente. At pangatlo, ang pagkakaroon ng disenyo ng bahay na angkop sa lugar at sa kalamidad.

Upang matulungan ang mga miyembro nito, ang SEDPI ay kasalukuyang nagsasagawa ng socialized housing, SEDPI Building Adequate Livable Affordable and Inclusive (BALAI) communities, na naglalayong magbigay ng maayos at disaster resilient housing sa mga low-income members. Ang organisasyon ay nakikipagtulungan din sa pamahalaan, social investors, at civic organizations upang magbigay ng abot-kayang pabahay sa mga nangangailangan.

Fragile recovery persists among nanoenterprises post pandemic

Update 18 of SEDPI’s Rapid Community Assessment (RCA)
October – December 2022

As the world slowly recovers from the pandemic, the economic landscape remains uncertain, especially for nanoenterprises. A recent survey conducted by our organization, Social Enterprise Development Partnerships, Inc. (SEDPI), reveals that 99% of nanoenterprises have resumed operations as of December 2022, indicating a promising recovery for this crucial sector of the economy.

Despite the positive news, recovery remains fragile with 52% of nanoenterprises surveyed experiencing weak demand. Access to supplies has been a continuing concern with 27% of nanoenterprises still reporting difficulties in obtaining the necessary supplies.

SEDPI’s latest self-rated poverty survey reveals that the impact of the pandemic on poverty levels remains significant. For 2022, 54% of respondents rated themselves at the poverty line, a decrease from 81% in 2021. The number of respondents who rated themselves as poor is steady at 3% and 4%. On a positive note, the number of respondents who no longer consider themselves poor nearly tripled from 16% in 2021 to 41% in 2022.

According to the Social Weather Stations, which conducts the survey at the national level, self-rated poverty was recorded at 48% in 2021 and 51% in 2022. The considerably elevated self-rated poverty at the national level suggest that a greater number of nanoenterprises that SEDPI serves experienced better economic conditions.

Over the past three years, SEDPI has conducted an impact assessment to evaluate its support for nanoenterprises through self-evaluation or perception surveys. The results are as follows:

	Dec 19	Dec 21	Dec 22
Help in growing business	82%	100%	98%
Education of children	70%	85%	98%
Improve housing	67%	99%	98%
Improve nutrition	81%	100%	100%
Increase income	82%	100%	97%

The perception survey suggests that SEDPI’s assistance plays a crucial role in alleviating hardships among nanoenterprises in areas such as business growth, education, housing, nutrition, and income. This may be the reason why the highly significantly lower self-rated poverty data among SEDPI nanoenterprises compared to the national survey. Additional interventions and strategies in the areas of disaster risk reduction, housing and health are necessary to enable a more comprehensive and lasting escape from poverty.

The majority of respondents are nanoenterprises (45%), owned and operated by women, with an average age of 43 and 73% being married. Of these nanoenterprises, 40% rely on other sources of income, such as employment, while 12% are unpaid family members, and 2% are unemployed.

SEDPI is a microfinance institution dedicated to providing ethical financing to nanoenterprises in Agusan del Sur, Davao de Oro, Davao del Norte, and Surigao del Sur. Their efforts have led to significant improvements in various aspects of the beneficiaries’ lives, such as business growth, education, housing, nutrition, and income.

November 27, 2022 (Update 17): 77% of nanoenterprises recover from the pandemic
April 27, 2022 (Update 16): Only 26% of nanoenterprise resume normal operations from the pandemic
February 8, 2022 (Update 15): Poverty among nanoenterprises worsens amid the pandemic
October 23, 2021 (Update 14): Nanoenterprise resuming normal operations slumps
July 25, 2021 (Update 13): Nanoenterprise recovery almost doubles to 63% a year after lockdowns
April 22, 2021 (Update 12): 1 out of 4 nanoenterprises adopted online selling in response to lockdowns
January 20, 2021 (Update 11): Typhoon hampers bounce back of nanoenterprises in CARAGA
July 17, 2020 (Update 10): Almost 4 in 10 nanoenterprises bounce back to pre-pandemic level
June 12, 2020 (Update 9): Microenterprises show signs of bouncing back as lockdown eases
May 28, 2020 (Update 8): 8 out of 10 microenterprises open for business one month after GCQ
May 22, 2020 (Update 7): Demand for microenterprise products remain weak amid COVID pandemic
May 15, 2020 (Update 6): Demand slumps on microenterprise products 2 weeks after GCQ
May 8, 2020 (Update 5): Only 5% of microenterprises back to “normal” in first week of GCQ
April 30, 2020 (Update 4): Two in three microenterprises hopeful to bounce back two months after lockdow – UPDATE 4
April 24, 2020 (Update 3): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 3
April 14, 2020 (Update 2): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 2
April 6, 2020 (Update 1): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 1
March 30, 2020: Immediate impact of COVID-19 lockdown to microenterprises

1 out of 4 nanoenterprises adopted online selling in response to lockdowns

At least one out of four nanoenerprises are now either selling their products online, or are buying products to be sold in their local communities to cope with granular lockdowns imposed by local government units. Out of 7,675 respondents, 26% sold products and 29% bought supplies online, to augment their livelihood operations.

Nanoenterprise is a SEDPI-coined term that refers to unregistered livelihoods of self-employed individuals that have capitalization of less than PhP50,000 to operate. SEDPI estimates that the vast majority of entrepreneurial poor in the Philippines are nanoenterprises, numbering around 8 million.

Nano level risk diversification

More than half of the respondents or 52% also claimed that they added other kinds of livelihoods in response to the pandemic. Nanoenterprises refer to this as “diskarte” to be able to survive the negative economic impact of the pandemic. Diskarte is the ability to use creativity and resourcefulness to respond to challenges and adversities.

Nanoenterprises involved in the agricultural sector were better able to weather the pandemic compared to their non-agri counterparts. Eighty nine percent of the respondents said that those with farms were able to adjust and fair better.

Farming households were able to harvest produce for consumption. The surplus farm produce were then sold in local markets through ambulant vending and online selling. This resulted in reduced expenses for food and at the same time provided ample additional income

Status of nanoenterprises

A year after the Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) imposed in the whole country, all

nanoenterprises reported that they already resumed operations. At the peak of the ECQ last year, 69% of them stopped operations which prompted the government to distribute cash assistance.

As of March 2021, four out of ten respondents said that they have fully recovered from the negative economic impact of the pandemic; while 55% said that it will take them up to 2 months more, before they get back to their pre-pandemic levels.

During the first quarter of the year most areas in the country were under Modified General Community Quarantine (MGCQ), the lowest quarantine level imposed by the Philippine government. These reinvigorated the local economy due to ease in the flow of goods and mobility of customers.

Social Enterprise Development Partnerships, Inc. (SEDPI)

SEDPI provides capital to nanoenterprises through joint ventures to approximately 10,000 low-income households in Agusan del Sur, Davao de Oro and Surigao del Sur. Its members also benefit from life insurance as well as medical and disaster relief assistance through damayan. SEDPI also partnered with SSS and Pag-IBIG to bring social safety net programs of the government closer to nanoenterprises in rural areas.

This research is part of a series of rapid community assessments that determines the economic impact of COVID-19 to nanoenterprises. SEDPI began the research last March 2020. This latest update was conducted on April 2021 to cover the first quarter of 2021.

The 7,695 respondents is not a representative sample of the entire Philippines. It is highly localized to SEDPI members. However, this is a good case study that reflects the situation of nanoenterprise and the local economy in the countryside. SEDPI believes that the nationwide picture is not far from its research results.

Summary of findings:

Out of 7,675 SEDPI nanoenterprise respondents 26% sold products and 29% bought supplies online to augment their livelihood operations
100% are resumed livelihood operations a year after the hard lockdown
52% added other kinds of livelihoods in response to the pandemic
89% said that those with farms were able to adjust and fair better
40% fully recovered from the negative impact of the pandemic
55% said it will take them up to 2 months more before they get back to their pre-pandemic levels

Previous rapid community assessment updates. The titles are hyperlinked. Click on the titles to full read article online.

January 20, 2021 (Update 11): Typhoon hampers bounce back of nanoenterprises in CARAGA
July 17, 2020 (Update 10): Almost 4 in 10 nanoenterprises bounce back to pre-pandemic level
June 12, 2020 (Update 9): Microenterprises show signs of bouncing back as lockdown eases
May 28, 2020 (Update 8): 8 out of 10 microenterprises open for business one month after GCQ
May 22, 2020 (Update 7): Demand for microenterprise products remain weak amid COVID pandemic
May 15, 2020 (Update 6): Demand slumps on microenterprise products 2 weeks after GCQ
May 8, 2020 (Update 5): Only 5% of microenterprises back to “normal” in first week of GCQ
April 30, 2020 (Update 4): Two in three microenterprises hopeful to bounce back two months after lockdow – UPDATE 4
April 24, 2020 (Update 3): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 3
April 14, 2020 (Update 2): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 2
April 6, 2020 (Update 1): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 1
March 30, 2020: Immediate impact of COVID-19 lockdown to microenterprises

Microinsurance: Abot-kayang klase ng insurance

Pinaka-essence ng insurance ang pooling of risks over a large number of similar units such as households, persons or businesses. Inispread natin ang risk para yung financial loss ay hindi lang sa atin tatama.

Insurance should not be treated as an investment

Hindi dapat pinagkakakitaan ang insurance dahil hindi ito investment. Para itong bayanihan, you are protecting against financial loss. Hindi financial gain ang habol dito kundi protection from financial losses. Nagbibigay ng proteksyon ang insurance ng katumbas na halaga sakaling mawala ang isang bagay.

Ang insurance ay involved with exchanging the uncertain prospect of large losses for the certainty of small, regular premium payments. Nagbabayad ang maraming tao at pino-pool natin. Ibig sabihin, nagbabayad tayo ng malilit para kapag may tinamaang isa sa pool na ‘yon ay may matatanggap to compensate for the loss.

Sa mga pagkakataong may biglang mangyari sa‘yo na hindi maiiwasan, kahit paano ay makakatulong sa mga mahal mo na may pagkuhanan sila sa ganyang pagkakataon. Yan ang insurance. Sana malinaw na malinaw yan.

Microinsurance defined

Ang microinsurance ay nakapaloob sa batas natin under RA 10607, otherwise known as the Amended Insurance Code. Ito ang definition na nakapaloob sa ating batas. It meets the risk protection needs of the poor. Ang target nito ay iyong mga nasa laylayan, mga low-income households kaya micro ang tinatawag diyan.

Ayon sa batas, ang premiums, fees and charges ng microinsurance does not exceed 7.5% of the current daily minimum wage. Sa PhP570 na daily minimum wage dito sa NCR, PhP42.75 ang katumbas nito. Kung gagamitin ang 260 days na average number of annual working days, hindi dapat lalagpas sa PhP11,115 kada taon.

Ito ang sinasabi sa ating batas na mga benefits na makukuha sa microinsurance: ang guaranteed benefits should not exceed 1,000 times of the current daily minimum wage. Katumbas ito ng PhP570,000 kung gagamitin ang parehong rate sa itaas.

Microinsurance for OFW family members

Very relevant ang microinsurance sa mga OFWs, dahil ginagawa silang “insurance” ng mga kamag-anak dito sa Pilipinas. Puwedeng ikuha sila ng microinsurance para hindi mga OFWs ang gagawing insurance policy.

Mas mura kasi ito. Magbabayad ng maliit na premium ang OFW para icover ang kanilang family members. Kapag may nangyari sa kanila, yung insured amount ay makukuha ng mga beneficiaries mula sa insurance company. Mapuputol ang dependency of family members sa OFWs.

Microinsurance for protection

So, there mga besties, ito ang detalyadong discussion ng microinsurance. Laging tandaan na nag pagpaplano ng maaga ay isa sa pinakamagandang decision para kinabukasan mo at ng iyong mga mahal sa buhay.

Forms of insurance

May apat na forms ang insurance – formal, informal, public at hybrid.

Pooling of risks over a large number of similar units such as households, persons or businesses ang insurance. Inispread ang risk para ang financial loss ay hindi pasan lamang ng iisa kundi ng marami.

Formal insurance

Galing sa corporations and cooperatives ang formal insurance. Formal insurance ang tawag sa kanila dahil sila ay regulated ng Insurance Commission.

A cooperative is owned by members. Ang corporation on the other hand is a capitalist at profit-led. Mayroon ding Mutual Benefit Association (MBA) under formal insurance. Ito ay mga non-profit forms ng insurance companies sa Pilipinas.

Para sa akin, ang gusto ko talaga ay MBA o di kaya’y cooperative kasi hindi profit ang nauuna. Iyong kapakanan ng tao ang nangunguna.

Informal Insurance

“Damayan-based” scheme ang informal insurance. In Ilocano, damayan means “saranay”. Sa mga Bisaya, ito ay “dayong”. Sa mga Muslim brothers and sisters natin, ang tawag dito ay “takaful.”

Mahaba na talaga ang kasaysayan ng insurance dito sa Pilipinas. Dahil ingrained sa ating mga Pilipino ang damayan. Ginulo lang ito nga mga Westerners dahil ang ginawa nila itong for profit na siyang mas namamayagpag ngayon. Sa akin, ang insurance ay hindi dapat for profit.

Public Insurance

Idinagdag ko ito dahil ito ang mga social safety nets o social insurance schemes na ibinibigay ng gobyerno para sa atin. Examples nito ay ang mga insurance benefits – health, sickness, disability, unemployment, death etc. mula sa Pag-IBIG, PhilHealth at SSS.

Hybrid Insurance

Combination of both formal and informal forms ang hybrid insurance. Pinaghalo ang dalawa. May mga programa ding bukod sa formal at informal ay idinadagdag ang public insurance tulad ng Social Welfare Protection Program (SWEPP) ng SEDPI.

Kinds of insurance

Pooling of risks over a large number of similar units such as households, persons or businesses ang insurance. Pinaghahati-hatian ng maraming ang risks – tulad ng kamatayan, pagkakasakit, aksidente, kalamidad – para ang financial loss ay hindi pasan lamang ng iisa kundi ng marami tao.

Term insurance
Upon death of the insured, may benefits paid to beneficiaries ang term insurance. May matatanggap na benefit sa mga beneficiaries kapag namatay ang insured. Ibig sabihin nito, kailangang may mamamatay (yung insured) para may tatanggap nito. Gusto n’yo ba ang claim na ito? Siyempre hindi, di ba? Kung sa akin lang, gusto ko buhay ako! Pero yan ang reyalidad sa buhay na hindi maiwasan. That goes without saying, lahat tayo ay mamamatay. Mangyayari at mangyayari ‘yan, kaya dapat lang na paghandaan. Sino ba sa atin ang hindi mamamatay? Kung breadwinner at may mga dependents, dapat kumuha ng term insurance. Pero kung walang dependents, hindi kailangang kumuha ng life insurance.

Disability insurance Benefit paid to beneficiaries upon disability o pagkabaldado ang disability insurance. Ibinabayad sa mga beneficiaries kapag yung insured ay ma-disable. Again, ito ay para sa mga breadwinners at may mga dependents.

Credit Insurance
Kung may utang tapos, kumuha ng credit insurance para kapag namatay ay hindi maipapasa sa estate ang utang. Ang insurance company ang magbabayad ng utang mo, in case na may mangyari sa iyo. Kaming mga may-ari ng financial institution na nagpapautang sa mga micoenterprises ay ikinukuha naming sila ng credit life insurance. So that in case na may biglang mangyari sa kanila ay hindi na kami tatakbo pa sa mga naiwang kamag-anak na maningil sa utang ng yumao.

Crop Insurance
Protection for poor crop yields and natural disaster recovery ang crop insurance. Ito ay ibinibigay kung mayroong natural calamities o di kaya’y natural disasters na tatama sa mga magsasaka tulad ng bagyo, pagbaha, drought, peste at marami pang iba.

Health Insurance
Medical coverage for illness and injuries ang health insurance. Kapag naospital o di kaya ay inoperahan, ang health insurance ang magkocover ng mga gastos sa hospital.

Property Insurance
Protection para sa damage, destruction and theft of household assets ang property insurance. Kung nagmamay-ari ng sasakyan, bahay, inventory ng business o warehouse, puwede itong iinsure.