Reimagining Farmers as Partners: Leveraging Savings for Credit Risk Mitigation in the Agricultural Sector

Delivered on May 23, 2023 at the Agricultural Credit Policy Council event held at the PICC

Financial inclusion remains an essential factor for sustainable economic development, particularly in the realm of the agricultural sector. Having access to a broad range of financial services – which includes not only credit but also savings, insurance, and money transfer services – equips individuals with the necessary tools to weather financial shocks, invest in opportunities, and subsequently improve their livelihoods.

However, recent data reflects a concerning trend in this regard. Based on the Financial Inclusion Survey of 2021, the percentage of adults in the Philippines with savings sharply declined from 53% in 2019 to 37% in 2021. This dip may be partly attributable to the economic upheavals caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have led to reduced household income or increased medical expenses.

Moreover, the utility of savings accounts reflected a similar downturn. In 2019, 76% of account holders actively used their savings accounts, but by 2021, this figure had plunged to a mere 56%. In raw numbers, this decline signifies a decrease of approximately 9.7 million savers, from 38.6 million in 2019 to just 28.9 million in 2021.

Among the sectors most affected by this trend is agriculture, forestry, and fishery (AFF), which, despite making significant contributions to the economy, remains financially underprivileged. The 2021 Financial Inclusion Survey disclosed that only about 30% of the 2.3 million workers engaged in AFF reported having any form of savings. This indicates that less than half (only 30%) of our colleagues in the agri-fishery sector are saving or have savings.

Delving deeper into the data, we find that of those AFF workers who are saving, a mere 27.2% or around 191,000 are saving through formal channels. A significantly larger portion, 82.2% or approximately 577,000 individuals, are resorting to informal means. These statistics illustrate that the sector is severely lagging in formal savings, with a disproportionately higher percentage of informal savers compared to the overall population.

The need for comprehensive financial inclusion strategies

The substantial decrease in the number of savers, especially in the agricultural sector, is indeed disheartening. The trend underscores that simply providing appropriate savings products, while a vital step, is insufficient in addressing the larger issue. Comprehensive strategies that extend beyond the financial sector are required. This means initiatives designed not just to promote savings, but also to increase income, as these two factors are intrinsically linked.

To this end, the proactive role of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) in driving financial inclusion is highly commendable. The BSP’s initiatives towards fostering innovations in savings products design, collaborating with various government agencies to enhance financial services delivery, and launching a financial education strategy to increase financial literacy are all notable steps in the right direction. The ultimate goal of these interventions is to empower individuals with financial capability, which involves not just understanding but also effectively using financial services to improve their lives.

Interconnectivity

While significant strides have been made towards financial inclusion, certain challenges persist. Much of the innovation in the banking sector relies heavily on internet-based technologies. Yet, connectivity remains a significant hurdle in rural areas, where a large portion of the agricultural workforce resides. Additionally, the cost of owning a smartphone, which is often required to access digital financial services, is prohibitive for many farmers.

These challenges, however, are not insurmountable. One potential solution is to increase the presence of agency banking in areas where internet connectivity is weak. Agency banking, which involves non-bank retail outlets providing banking services, can help bridge the gap between the banking sector and the rural populace.

Furthermore, promoting the interoperability of savings products among strong cooperatives within the banking system could also be beneficial. A prime example is the Cebu People’s Multipurpose Cooperative (CBMPC), with its demonstrated capability in managing savings products and five decades of service. By aligning savings products across different financial institutions, we can foster a more inclusive and interconnected financial ecosystem that caters to the needs of the agricultural sector.

Savings product design for financial inclusion

The paradigm within financial institutions must shift from perceiving the economically disadvantaged as unable to save, to recognizing that they indeed can, given appropriate financial products. The importance of this shift becomes evident when considering institutions like the Cebu People’s Multipurpose Cooperative (CBMPC) and the Rural Bank of Solano (RBS), both of which have successfully demonstrated this principle.

Both CBMPC and RBS have designed their savings products with minimal opening and maintaining balances, thereby reducing barriers to entry for those with limited income. By adopting such an approach, these institutions have successfully extended financial services to the unbanked populace.

A distinctive characteristic of these institutions’ approach is the integration of financial education within their product offering. Recognizing that financial literacy is crucial for their clientele, CBMPC and RBS offer resources and programs to enhance understanding of savings and other financial concepts among their customers. This strategy does not only ensure the proper utilization of their products, but it also empowers their customers to make informed financial decisions.

Further reflecting the flexible and customer-centric nature of their product design, CBMPC and RBS allow savings to be used as collateral for loans. This system enables customers to access credit that might have been unattainable otherwise due to lack of traditional collateral. Importantly, the savings used as collateral remain accessible in times of emergencies, sickness, death, or disasters, further enhancing the financial security of their customers.

Credit extension at these institutions is linked with agricultural insurance. This approach mitigates the risk of loan default due to crop loss or other agricultural setbacks. It provides a safety net for both the farmers, who might otherwise be unable to repay loans after a poor harvest, and for the institution, which reduces its credit risk.

The experiences of CBMPC and RBS highlight the potential of well-designed savings products to promote financial inclusion and resilience among disadvantaged groups, such as the agri-fishery sector. By adopting a customer-centric approach, emphasizing financial education, and leveraging insurance and flexible collateral options, financial institutions can support their customers’ financial wellbeing while also managing their own risk.

Enhancing financial resilience in the agricultural sector through savings-secured loans

Savings-secured loans represent a significant innovation in the field of financial services, especially in terms of offering a lifeline in times of emergencies. The unique feature of these loans is that they use a customer’s savings as collateral, which allows the borrower to maintain access to these funds in times of urgent need.

In the agricultural sector, a unique set of financial challenges exist due to the cyclical nature of farming activities and the susceptibility to various risks such as weather, pests, and market fluctuations. Savings-secured loans offer a potential solution to these challenges and could significantly enhance the financial resilience of farmers.

One of the key advantages of savings-secured loans is that they enable farmers to use their savings as collateral. This feature allows them to access larger loans, or loans with more favorable terms, which may have been out of reach otherwise. Given the financial requirements of agricultural activities – significant initial outlays for seeds, fertilizers, equipment, and labor – access to substantial credit is essential. The use of savings as collateral bridges this gap, offering farmers the much-needed financial leverage at the start of the farming season.

For financial institutions, the use of savings as collateral significantly reduces credit risk. In the event a borrower defaults on the loan, the institution has recourse to recover its funds from the savings held as collateral. This safeguard makes the issuance of larger loans to farmers, who are often seen as high-risk borrowers due to the unpredictability of their income, a more viable option.

Beyond immediate financial needs, savings-secured loans also offer long-term benefits. They allow farmers, especially those who are economically disadvantaged, to build a credit history. A robust credit history can enhance their credibility as borrowers and increase their chances of accessing more substantial loans in the future, thereby enabling further growth and investment in their farming activities.

Savings-secured loans also incentivize borrowers to practice financial discipline. The necessity to repay loans promptly to regain access to their savings can motivate farmers to manage their funds wisely and maintain regular repayment schedules. This habit, in turn, fosters financial resilience and stability.

The inclusion of such flexible savings products in the offerings of financial institutions not only serves the customers by providing a financial buffer but also benefits the institution. It reduces the risk of loan default and encourages consistent use of financial services, thus leading to a sustainable and financially inclusive growth model.

From risky clients to partners in development

Farmers are often seen as high-risk clients by financial institutions. This perception arises from a combination of factors that affect farmers more than most other sectors:

  • Income volatility: The farming sector is subject to the volatility of agricultural input costs and the instability of produce prices, which may fluctuate due to factors beyond a farmer’s control.
  • Susceptibility to external shocks: Farmers are at the mercy of weather conditions, pest infestations, diseases, and market changes, all of which can drastically impact income.
  • Lack of collateral: Many farmers lack the necessary assets to pledge as collateral for loans, limiting their access to credit.
  • Lack of credit history: Many farmers have not previously accessed formal financial services, and therefore lack a credit history that would demonstrate their creditworthiness to potential lenders.
  • Limited financial capability: Farmers often have limited financial knowledge and skills, reducing their ability to effectively manage financial products and services.

Despite these challenges, it is essential to acknowledge the crucial role that farmers play in society and the economy. They contribute significantly to food security, a fundamental aspect of any nation’s stability. Additionally, the agricultural sector serves as an economic driver for growth, providing employment opportunities and contributing to GDP.

Therefore, financial institutions need to reassess their view of farmers. They should be seen as partners in development, rather than risky clients. This shift in perspective is crucial in driving inclusive growth and development, especially in economies heavily reliant on agriculture.

To make this partnership successful, financial institutions can adopt the following strategies:

  • Integrating appropriate financial products in credit extension: Products like crop insurance can help mitigate the financial risks associated with farming. Also, savings-secured loans, which use savings as collateral but allow withdrawals in emergencies, can provide farmers with the flexibility they need to manage their financial lives.
  • Providing financial education: Providing financial literacy programs can help farmers better understand and manage financial products and services, improving their financial capability and making them more reliable borrowers.
  • Extending government support: Collaboration with government agencies, especially in areas such as disaster risk reduction, can provide additional safeguards against the inherent risks associated with farming. This collaboration can also facilitate the delivery of financial services to the agricultural sector.

Government support

Active participation of the government in supporting farmers is crucial, especially in providing subsidies and assistance that the private sector may find challenging to cover. For instance, the government can step in to subsidize the cost of farming equipment, high-quality seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation facilities, to reduce the burden on farmers. The government can also subsidize crop insurance, which can serve as a safety net against the loss due to unpredictable events like natural calamities, pest infestations, or market fluctuations.

Furthermore, the government’s role is paramount in implementing disaster risk mitigation strategies and providing post-disaster relief and recovery support. This assistance can ensure the continued delivery of financial services to the agricultural sector, even in the face of adverse events. Such government interventions not only shield farmers from severe financial distress but also make farming a more viable and sustainable profession, encouraging economic growth and food security.

In sum, viewing farmers as partners in development necessitates a change in perspective from financial institutions, along with the provision of appropriate financial products and support mechanisms. This partnership not only promotes financial inclusion among farmers but also contributes to a more resilient and sustainable agricultural sector.

SEDPI at Ambagan PH Tumulong sa mga Nasalanta ng Bagyong Vicky

Agad na nag-abot ng tulong ang SEDPI at Ambagan PH sa 1,884 na nasalanta ng bagyong Vicky sa Agusan del Sur at Surigao del Sur. 

Matapos ang tuloy-tuloy na ulan na dulot ng bagyong Vicky sa Mindanao nagdulot ito ng pagbaha at landslide. 

Kasama sa naapektuhan ay ang mga residente ng Agusan del Sur at Surigao del Sur, kung saan mayroong microfinance operations ang SEDPI Development Finance, Inc. 

Mula sa 10,000 SEDPI members, 1,884 ang apektado sa mga bayan ng Trento, Santa Josefa, Barobo, at Rosario sa Agusan del Sur at Lingig at Bislig sa Surigao del Sur. Dalawa ang inanod ng baha ang bahay. Isa naman ang na-landslide.

Bago pa mabagyo ang Mindanao, naging handa ang SEDPI sa pagtulong nito sa mga nasalanta dahil sa Social Welfare Protection Program (SWEPP). 

SWEPP ay ang hybrid microinsurance program ng SEDPI na pinagsasama ang “damayan” o pagtutulungan ng kapwa; formal life insurance mula sa CLIMBS Life and General Insurance cooperative; at social safety nets mula sa gobyerno na binibigay ng SSS at Pag-IBIG Fund. 

Maliban sa regular contributions sa SSS at Pag-IBIG, nagcocontribute ang mga members ng PhP360 every six months para ma-cover ng SWEPP. 

Ang bahagi ng kontribusyon ay linalaan para sa “damayan”. Ginagamit ang naiambag ng mga members para tulungan ang kamember nila sa panahon ng kamatayan, pagkakasakit, sunog, o kalamidad. 

Pondo mula sa SWEPP Damayan ang pinagkuhanan para sa relief goods sa mga nabaha at dagdag na PhP5,000 sa tatlong na-wipe out ang bahay.

Ani ng Vince Rapisura, Presidente ng SEDPI,“Ito ay isang patunay na ang mahihirap ay kaya nilang tulungan ang mga sarili nila kung merong maayos na sistema at hindi kinukurakot.” 

Nadagdagan ang pondo para sa relief operation nung nag-donate ang Ambagan PH sa SEDPI Foundation, Inc. ng PhP20,000.

Ang Ambagan PH ay isang network ng volunteers at initiatives na nabuo para tumugon sa mga krisis, tulad ng bagyong Vicky. Donasyon at crowdsourcing ang pangunahing pinagmumulan ng kanila resources. 

Sa karanasan nila mula ng October 2020 na-realize nila na, “Walang maliit o malaking ambag. Sa panahon ng krisis, lahat ng ambag ay dakila.”

Bawat pack ng relief goods na napamigay ng SEDPI at Ambagan PH ay naglaman ng limang kilong bigas at ilang groceries na good for one week para sa pamilya na may limang miyembro.

Pasalamat ng SEDPI member na si Dondon Ocsema, “Malaking tulong iyon para suportahan ang ilang araw na kakainin lalo na ilang araw akong hindi nakapamasada.”

Dahil meron na silang makakain para sa isang linggo mas nabigyang tuon ng mga nasalata, tulad ni Dondon, ang pag-aayos sa kanilang mga bahay at gamit. 

Isa itong full-circle experience para kay Angelica Reyes o Anj na SEDPI Senior Program Officer at Co-Founder at Spokesperson din ng Ambagan PH. 

Nagsimula ang 2020 nang mag-interview si Anj, kasama ang iba pang taga SEDPI, ng members sa Agusan del Sur at Surigao del Sur para malaman ang impact ng microfinance program. 

Anj Reyes kasama ang ilang SEDPI members nung February 2020

Nagtapos ang taon na pinagtagpo ni Anj ang SEDPI at ang sinimulan niyang grupo na Ambagan PH para tumulong sa mga taong minsan ay nakadaupang-palad niya.

“Malaki ang pasasalamat ko sa SEDPI dahil marami sa organizational at administrative skills ko ay natutunan ko mula sa pagiging program officer ng SEDPI. Higit sa lahat, lalong napatibay ng SEDPI ang advocacy ko na makatulong sa kapwa.” – Angelica Reyes

Para sa mga gustong mag-ambag, pumunta lang sa facebook.com/ambaganph at i-click ang sign up link.

 

 

 

 

Microinsurance: Abot-kayang klase ng insurance

Pinaka-essence ng insurance ang pooling of risks over a large number of similar units such as households, persons or businesses. Inispread natin ang risk para yung financial loss ay hindi lang sa atin tatama.

Insurance should not be treated as an investment

Hindi dapat pinagkakakitaan ang insurance dahil hindi ito investment. Para itong bayanihan, you are protecting against financial loss. Hindi financial gain ang habol dito kundi protection from financial losses. Nagbibigay ng proteksyon ang insurance ng katumbas na halaga sakaling mawala ang isang bagay.

Ang insurance ay involved with exchanging the uncertain prospect of large losses for the certainty of small, regular premium payments. Nagbabayad ang maraming tao at pino-pool natin. Ibig sabihin, nagbabayad tayo ng malilit para kapag may tinamaang isa sa pool na ‘yon ay may matatanggap to compensate for the loss.

Sa mga pagkakataong may biglang mangyari sa‘yo na hindi maiiwasan, kahit paano ay makakatulong sa mga mahal mo na may pagkuhanan sila sa ganyang pagkakataon. Yan ang insurance. Sana malinaw na malinaw yan.

Microinsurance defined

Ang microinsurance ay nakapaloob sa batas natin under RA 10607, otherwise known as the Amended Insurance Code. Ito ang definition na nakapaloob sa ating batas. It meets the risk protection needs of the poor. Ang target nito ay iyong mga nasa laylayan, mga low-income households kaya micro ang tinatawag diyan.

Ayon sa batas, ang premiums, fees and charges ng microinsurance does not exceed 7.5% of the current daily minimum wage. Sa PhP570 na daily minimum wage dito sa NCR, PhP42.75 ang katumbas nito. Kung gagamitin ang 260 days na average number of annual working days, hindi dapat lalagpas sa PhP11,115 kada taon.

Ito ang sinasabi sa ating batas na mga benefits na makukuha sa microinsurance: ang guaranteed benefits should not exceed 1,000 times of the current daily minimum wage. Katumbas ito ng PhP570,000 kung gagamitin ang parehong rate sa itaas.

Microinsurance for OFW family members

Very relevant ang microinsurance sa mga OFWs, dahil ginagawa silang “insurance” ng mga kamag-anak dito sa Pilipinas. Puwedeng ikuha sila ng microinsurance para hindi mga OFWs ang gagawing insurance policy.

Mas mura kasi ito. Magbabayad ng maliit na premium ang OFW para icover ang kanilang family members. Kapag may nangyari sa kanila, yung insured amount ay makukuha ng mga beneficiaries mula sa insurance company. Mapuputol ang dependency of family members sa OFWs.

Microinsurance for protection

So, there mga besties, ito ang detalyadong discussion ng microinsurance.  Laging tandaan na nag pagpaplano ng maaga ay isa sa pinakamagandang decision para kinabukasan mo at ng iyong mga mahal sa buhay.

Forms of insurance

May apat na forms ang insurance – formal, informal, public at hybrid.

Pooling of risks over a large number of similar units such as households, persons or businesses ang insurance. Inispread ang risk para ang financial loss ay hindi pasan lamang ng iisa kundi ng marami.

Formal insurance

Galing sa corporations and cooperatives ang formal insurance. Formal insurance ang tawag sa kanila dahil sila ay regulated ng Insurance Commission.

A cooperative is owned by members. Ang corporation on the other hand is a capitalist at profit-led. Mayroon ding Mutual Benefit Association (MBA) under formal insurance. Ito ay mga non-profit forms ng insurance companies sa Pilipinas.

Para sa akin, ang gusto ko talaga ay MBA o di kaya’y cooperative kasi hindi profit ang nauuna. Iyong kapakanan ng tao ang nangunguna.

Informal Insurance

“Damayan-based” scheme ang informal insurance. In Ilocano, damayan means “saranay”. Sa mga Bisaya, ito ay “dayong”. Sa mga Muslim brothers and sisters natin, ang tawag dito ay “takaful.”

Mahaba na talaga ang kasaysayan ng insurance dito sa Pilipinas. Dahil ingrained sa ating mga Pilipino ang damayan. Ginulo lang ito nga mga Westerners dahil ang ginawa nila itong for profit na siyang mas namamayagpag ngayon. Sa akin, ang insurance ay hindi dapat for profit.

Public Insurance

Idinagdag ko ito dahil ito ang mga social safety nets o social insurance schemes na ibinibigay ng gobyerno para sa atin. Examples nito ay ang mga insurance benefits – health, sickness, disability, unemployment, death etc. mula sa Pag-IBIG, PhilHealth at SSS.

Hybrid Insurance

Combination of both formal and informal forms ang hybrid insurance. Pinaghalo ang dalawa. May mga programa ding bukod sa formal at informal ay idinadagdag ang public insurance tulad ng Social Welfare Protection Program (SWEPP) ng SEDPI.

Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries in Sultan Kudarat Receive Millions Worth of Agri-Inputs from DAR – IARCDSP

Pandemic or not, farmers in Mindanao tirelessly till the soil. This is why the Department of Agrarian Reform, together with SEDPI, continue to work while majority of the population are on a standstill to bring the most awaited agri-input investments from the DAR – Italian Assistance to ARC Development Support Program (IARCDSP) to our farmers. 

Five (5) Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries and Farmers Organizations in Sultan Kudarat received the first tranche of the promised agricultural inputs that shall kickstart their agricultural businesses supporting farmers in their Agrarian Reform Communities (ARC).

Josephine Balicaw, officer of Marguez United Irrigators Farmers Association (MUIFAI) in Pag-asa ARC, couldn’t help but shed tears when around PhP1.5M sacks worth of inputs were unloaded from a 10-wheeler truck and brought to what was once an empty warehouse. They have been preparing for this through the capacity interventions of SEDPI and now the moment has come for them to put theory into action. 

 

Josephine Balicaw, third from left, together with other officers and members of Marguez United Irrigators Farmers Association in Pag-asa ARC.

In the same way, Noria Gapor, officer of Sigay Ka Tamontaka 4 Association (SKTFA) from Kutawato ARC, was reeling with disbelief when she was told that all the sacks were to be offloaded and not brought elsewhere. “Akala ko ilang sako lang para sa amin. Lahat pala!” (I thought we’re only getting a few sacks of inputs but we’re getting them all!), said Gapor.

It is quite an emotional experience as well for our farmers in Naldan Creek Irrigators Association (NCIA) in Lambayong ARC, Kalayaan Communal Irrigators Association (KCIA) in Lutayan ARC, and Taguisa Agrarian Reform Beneficiary Multi-Purpose Cooperative (TARBMPC) in Lebak ARC. For these ARBOs, now that the inputs are here, they will be able to provide farmer-friendly agri-input financing, farm machineries rental, and hauling services to fellow farmers in their community.

This is one of the foreign- assisted projects being implemented by the Department of Agrarian Reform and funded under the loan agreement executed with the Government of Italy. This project involves not only millions worth of agricultural inputs, farm machineries and equipment, hauling trucks, but also intensive capacity building training on microfinance management tools and monitoring & evaluation systems spearheaded by SEDPI. 

There is a total of 35 Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries/Farmers Organizations involved in the DAR – IARCDSP Project covering Sarangani, Sultan Kudarat, Maguindanao, and Lanao del Sur Provinces. 

 

Blockchains: Where does Bitcoin come from?

If central banks print currencies, where does Bitcoin come from?

Blockchain

Bitcoin enigmatically appeared in the Internet. Satoshi Nakamoto, its unknown originator, used blockchain technology in order to create Bitcoin.

Blockchains are democratized “public” ledgers. Ledgers are the recordkeeping books that accountants and bookkeepers typically use. Thus, blockchains are one method of record-keeping.

Because blockchain is public, everyone can access it. Democratized means there is no single institution that administers the recordkeeping– there are many.

Conventional banking system

If a person in Dubai were to send remittance to the Philippines, their bank would first verify their identity and confirm that they received money to be sent to the Philippines. The bank in Dubai would then contact the Philippine bank to send the value requested.

The Philippine bank undergoes a similar process of verifying that money was received and that the recipient exists and is who they say they are. This process of record-keeping requires people and technology and incurs costs. The remittance sender is typically charged a fee and the remittance receiver often receives less than what was sent to cover these costs.

Banks act as middlemen in financial transactions. With this role, they charge fees which is expensive especially to low income groups, the majority of the population.

In the case of blockchain, there is no need to go through banks. It eliminates these expensive middlemen and allows direct transactions with anyone who have access to the technology.

Recordkeeping

To ensure correct recordkeeping, multiple devices are used in the blockchain around the world in anetwork. They simultaneously record and verify the transaction.

If even a single of these devices in the blockchain were not to match, then the entire transaction would be invalidated because it is no longer consistent is the network. This prevents fraudulent recordkeeping to occur and upholds the integrity and accuracy of the network.

Blockchain is efficient

Using blockchain through the internet, the middleman is eliminated, and transaction fees would be reduced. It would be a cheaper system compared to the current system of incurring bank fees.

Blockchain keeps your privacy

Typically, banks require proof of identification in order to proceed with transactions. This makes transactions traceable in order to prevent money laundering and financing of terrorist activities.

Contrary to conventional banking, blockchain is anonymous. The anonymity of blockchain means that there is no need to furnish proof of identity, as the blockchain goes through its own verification method.

However, scammers and criminals were the first to take advantage of the anonymity of cryptocurrency transactions. This resulted to many cryptocurrencies linked to illicit financial transactions that continues to paint cryptocurrencies in bad light.

Use of blockchain

Cryptocurrency is just one use of blockchain. As a secure, efficient, and tamper-proof method of recordkeeping, blockchain can be used to verify any type of interaction. Its uses could range from government use, insurance, international trade, health care, and real estate, etc.

Admittedly, blockchain is a very powerful technology that could be used for social good. However, when used by the wrong hands, it could also be equally used to the detriment of society.

SEDPI’s Group Yearly Renewable Term Insurance

SEDPI offers Group Renewable Term Insurance (GYRT) in partnership with CLIMBS, a service more catered to common Filipino households.

Term insurance provides protection against emergencies for a specific period of time. As lifetime coverage is not always needed, term insurance provides cheaper premiums with larger benefits. On average, investment-linked insurance schemes charge PhP80,000 in premiums.

For the same PhP1 million coverage, individual term life insurance premiums can be as low as PhP5,500 for ages 21-30 and cap around PhP21,000 for ages 51-60. SEDPI’s Group Yearly Renewable Term has PhP500,000 life benefits and PhP500,000 accident benefits. For ages 18-60, the premium is PhP4,000. This makes it even more affordable compared to individual term insurance policies. Due to its affordability, participation in group insurance is high.

Group insurance means that one contract is issued to cover a group of people. In this case, SEDPI is the policyholder. As a SEDPI member, one is entitled to access this group insurance program, even if they are abroad.

OFWs dealing directly with Philippine-based insurance agents are constrained by a lack of international selling licenses. Since SEDPI is the policyholder an directly deals with CLIMBS, OFWs can participate in the insurance program. Eligibility is determined by membership to SEDPI, and the process does not require rigorous underwriting due to the large number of members.

Yearly Renewable insurance indicates that the insurance protection coverage is active for one year. The annual premium must be paid in order to restart coverage for the following term.

The group’s performance based on mortality rates is evaluated each year. A higher mortality rate may mean a higher adjusted premium the following year, but a lower mortality rate than average can lead to a lower premium for the group.

SEDPI members in Mindanao have exhibited lower mortality rates, and SEDPI is in negotiations with CLIMBS to lower the premium for this group.

Enter keyword GYRT on Vince Rapisura’s Facebook messenger to join.

What qualifies as microinsurance in the Philippines?

Insurance involves pooling risk over a large number of similar units such as households, persons, or businesses. It protects people and businesses against financial loss by spreading their risk among large numbers, and is similar to the concept of “bayanihan.”

Insurance is not an investment. You are not after financial gain. It is for protection against financial losses and involves exchanging the uncertain prospect of large losses for the certainty of small, regular premium products.

Term life is benefits paid to beneficiaries upon death. It is typically recommended for the breadwinners or those with dependents. Disability insurance is benefits paid to beneficiaries upon disability. Credit insurance ensures that loan principal and interest is paid by the insurance company upon death, rather than your estate.

Crop insurance offers protection against poor crop yields as well as recovery benefits from natural disasters. It is mainly utilized by farmers. Health insurance covers medical costs for illnesses and injuries. Property insurance covers damage, destruction, and theft of household assets. Business owners can also insure inventory and equipment at their stores and warehouses.

According to the Republic Act 10607 Amended Insurance Code, microinsurance is defined as meeting the risk protection needs of the poor. The “micro-” places emphasis on the fact that those with smaller incomes are the target policy holders. OFW’s can purchase microinsurance for loved ones back home so that the burden of having to personally absorb risk when loved ones are exposed to risks.

Furthermore, the premiums, fees, and charges of microinsurance do not exceed 7.5% of the policyholders’ current daily minimum wage. This means that for a daily income of PhP 570, the premium will not exceed ~PhP 15,600 for the year. The current benefits will not exceed x1000 the daily minimum wage, equivalent to PhP 570,000 to continue to be called a microinsurance.

Formal insurance is insurance provided by insurance corporations and co-operations and are regulated by the insurance commission. Although both corporation and co-ops are “for profit’ setups, co-ops are owned by the members. Rapisura recommends Mutual Benefit Associations (MBAs) or cooperative insurance, as it prioritizes the welfare of the people over the generation of profits.

Informal insurance refers to collectives such as damayan-based schemes, where insurance is a non-profit community endeavor. Hybrid insurance is a combination of formal and informal insurance. Public insurances are the social safety nets provided by the government such as the Universal Health Care Act and PhilHealth.

Never too small for hope (sari-sari store) – International Day of Rural Women 2020

Ms. Mary Jane Selecia, sari-sari store owner in Manguindanao, Philippines.

Mary Jane Selecia is a mother of five who lives in a rural community in Upi, Maguindanao in the Philippines. She runs a sari-sari store (corner store) in her community. COVID-19 has significantly affected their household and community.

To mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the government imposed community quarantine measures which includes physical distancing, movement restrictions, suspension of classes, and conduct of awareness campaigns on infection, prevention, and control measures (IPC). To cushion the socio-economic impact of the quarantine, subsidies were provided to households to complement their existing resources.

The government subsidy reminds Mary Jane that her household needs to maximize their savings. “My shop is bringing in one-third of the profit. I would earn around P4,000 (US$ 82) and now I am fortunate if I make P1,000 (US$20) a week. We invest P3,000 (US$ 61) a week just to keep the store running,” she said. Their household requirement for a month is estimated at PhP 9,000 (US$ 185) and was previously covered from the sari-sari store’s profits.

Borrowing money is becoming a vicious cycle for Mary Jane, “We have no savings and the income we make for our businesses go towards repaying our loans from relatives and friends. It seems like we are borrowing to pay over and over again,” she said.

Relief information is even more scarce when in the remote mountainous areas like Tinungkaan. The interventions in Mary Jane’s town were constrained to the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) conducting a survey to determine the poorest population in the village.

Mary Jane’s husband works as a Barangay Secretary and his work became an unexpected lifeline, “We did not need to apply for the Social Amelioration Program (SAP) because of my husband’s job. We are also beneficiaries of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps),” she explained.

The SAP has given qualified families P5,000 to P8,000 per month for two months. “We bought one sack of rice. The remaining money is additional capital for our store,” she said.

Farming has augmented the dwindling income of the household. “Our alternative sources of income are planting vegetables and raising farm animals. The small farm supports us while providing us with food. We are often forced to consume supplies from the sari-sari store,” she explained.

Stock in her store is already limited because of the limited supply in Noro, where she buys her supplies. Transportation cost for each of the trips to Noro is now P100, which is an exacerbated cost during the lockdown.

Everyday expenses have become a challenge for her community. “There is a decline in sales because many of our neighbors and customers do not have work,” she said. As the COVID-19 situation evolves, Mary Jane adapts to provide food on the table for her children and access to basic commodities in her community.

This case study on the plight of microenterprises in the Philippines was selected for the International Day for Rural Women (15 October 2020). It was originally shared across the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) platforms for the International Day for Rural Women

Here are the links:

Cambodia– Website: The Grain of the Matter
Link: FacebookTwitter

Link: FacebookTwitter

The Philippines
– Website: Never too Small for Hope
Link: FacebookTwitter

Almost 4 in 10 nanoenterprises bounce back to pre-pandemic level

Update 10: SEDPI Rapid community assessment on the impact of COVID-19 to nanoenterprises

Two months after the government started easing lockdowns in most parts of the country, 36% of nanoenterprises reported to have bounced back to pre-pandemic level. In May, only 18% expected to bounce back within one month which may be a good sign of recovery if the spread of the virus is contained.

Nanoenterprise (NE) is a SEDPI-coined term that refers to unregistered livelihoods of self-employed individuals. They typically operate informal businesses alone or with the help of unpaid family members targeting their own immediate local communities.

Status of nanoenterprises

Those that bounced back report that they are already able to earn about the same income; and experience normal demand to their products and services. For the month of June, there were twice as many nanoenterprises reporting slowdown in sales compared to those that reported strong demand.

Access to supply on inputs needed to operate their livelihoods remain stable.

Financing options

Nanoenterprises typically access loans from informal sources which make them vulnerable to predatory financing practices. Most of them borrow money from cooperatives, rural banks, microfinance NGOs and pawnshops.

On average, nanoenterprises borrow a small sum of money ranging from PhP3,000 to PhP10,000 to finance their livelihoods such as sari-sari stores, carinderia, farmers, fisherfolks, dressmaking and vending. Microfinance institutions offer collateral-free loans to them payable in three to six months with interest rates ranging from 2% to 5% per month.

With microenterprises cautious on demand, they prefer not to access loans. Only two of three of those who finished their loans opted to renew their for another cycle. This is also a sign that nanoenterprise have the ability to weigh risks and returns.

For the month of June, when normal loan collections resumed, one in three nanoenterprises was able to repay in accordance with amortizations based on the Bayanihan Act’s loan deferment schedule. A majority are requesting for up to two months additional grace period to allow them more time to adjust and cope with the new normal.

Essential financial service to low income group

There are approximately 8 million low income households that access microfinance services in the Philippines. MFIs are frontliners in the delivery of financial services to low income groups who find it difficult to open deposit accounts and access loans from commercial banks.

SEDPI estimates that a PhP40B economic assistance to nanoenterprises channeled through MFIs will address their financing needs to jumpstart their livelihoods. This is based on 8 milion estimated number of microenterprises and PhP5,000 economic assistance package.

The proposed Philippine economic stimulus package contains a total of PhP245 billion budget to assist micro, small and medium enterprises. Only a small fraction of this is expected to reach nanoenterprises.

Prioritizing nanoenterprises

The negative impact of COVID-19 to nanoenterprises is undeniable. The research shows that nanoenterprises are showing positive signs of bouncing back faster.

Preferential option to those at the bottom of the pyramid should be extended first since these groups can bounce back quickly; only need a small amount of stimulus; will reduce need for cash dole outs; and will reach millions of Filipino low income households.

 

Note:

The research is part of a series of rapid community assessments that determines the economic impact of COVID-19 to microenterprises and the informal sector. SEDPI, a microfinance institution (MFI), conducted the survey from June 23-30 with 5,791 respondents located in Agusan del Sur and Surigao del Sur.

It is not a representative sample of the entire Philippines. It is highly localized but should be a good case study that reflects the situation in the countryside. SEDPI believes that the nationwide experience may not be far from our research results.

Previous updates:

The titles are hyperlinked. Click on the titles to full read article online.

• June 12 (Update 9): Microenterprises show signs of bouncing back as lockdown eases
• May 28 (Update 8): 8 out of 10 microenterprises open for business one month after GCQ
• May 22 (Update 7): Demand for microenterprise products remain weak amid COVID pandemic
• May 15 (Update 6): Demand slumps on microenterprise products 2 weeks after GCQ
May 8 (Update 5): Only 5% of microenterprises back to “normal” in first week of GCQ
• April 30 (Update 4): Two in three microenterprises hopeful to bounce back two months after lockdow – UPDATE 4
• April 24 (Update 3): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 3
• April 14 (Update 2): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 2
• April 6 (Update 1): Community assessment and recommendations for support to microenterprises and the informal sector during and after COVID-19 – UPDATE 1
• March 30: Immediate impact of COVID-19 lockdown to microenterprises